How did our Moon form? The answer involves a cataclysmic collision between a young Earth and a Mars-sized protoplanet called Theia, about 4.5 billion years ago. This "giant impact" hypothesis explains why the Moon is so large relative to Earth, why its composition is so similar to Earth's mantle, and why it orbits the way it does. While this theory has become the leading explanation, recent computer simulations have revealed new details about how such a violent birth might have unfolded, including the possibility of multiple impacts or a "synestia"—a massive, rotating cloud of vaporized rock. This article explores the evidence for the giant impact, the challenges it faces, and the latest insights from computational modeling that are refining our understanding of how the Earth-Moon system came to be.

Introduction

The Earth-Moon system is unique among terrestrial planets in our solar system, characterized by the Moon's large size relative to Earth (about 1/81 of Earth's mass) and its nearly circular, prograde orbit. Early hypotheses for lunar origin included fission from a rapidly spinning Earth, capture from a passing body, or co-accretion with Earth. However, these faced significant dynamical and compositional inconsistencies. The modern paradigm, the giant impact hypothesis, emerged in the 1970s through the work of Hartmann and Davis, and was formalized by Cameron and Ward, proposing a collision between proto-Earth and a differentiated impactor that vaporized and ejected material into orbit.

This event is dated to ~4.5 Ga, shortly after Earth's accretion, and is inferred from isotopic evidence like Hf-W chronometry and lunar rock samples returned by Apollo missions. The hypothesis aligns with the late heavy bombardment and the dynamical evolution of the inner solar system. Despite its success, the model requires fine-tuning to match observations, spurring extensive hydrodynamic simulations over the past decades.

The Canonical Giant Impact Model

In the standard scenario, Theia impacts proto-Earth at an oblique angle (~45°) with a velocity of ~4 km/s, generating a hot, vapor-rich debris disk. Key outcomes include:

• Disk Formation and Accretion: The impact ejects ~1-5% of Earth's mass into a circumterrestrial disk, which cools and fragments into moonlets that merge to form the Moon within ~100-1000 years.
• Angular Momentum: The post-impact Earth-Moon system possesses excess angular momentum, dissipated over time via tidal interactions, leading to the Moon's current recession rate of ~3.8 cm/year.
• Compositional Mixing: Silicate vaporization ensures thorough mixing of Earth and Theia mantles, explaining bulk similarities.

Simulations using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and other codes have validated this framework, but parameter sensitivity (impactor mass ratio ~0.1-0.15, spin states) highlights the need for systematic exploration.

Challenges to the Standard Model

Several geochemical and geophysical observations challenge the simple mixing paradigm:

• Isotopic Homogeneity: Earth and lunar rocks exhibit identical oxygen, titanium, and tungsten isotopes, implying >95% mixing efficiency—difficult in a single impact without complete vaporization.
• Volatile Depletion: The Moon is depleted in volatiles like K, Na, and water relative to Earth, suggesting inefficient retention in the hot disk.
• Angular Momentum Deficit: Canonical impacts often produce too little final angular momentum unless the impactor is fast and grazing.

These issues have led to proposed modifications, including high-energy impacts forming a "synestia"—a massive, rotating vapor cloud extending beyond the Roche limit.

Multiple Impact Scenarios

An alternative to a single cataclysmic event is a series of smaller collisions during the final stages of terrestrial planet formation. This "multiple impact" hypothesis posits that the Moon accreted from debris of several Theia-like bodies, naturally achieving better isotopic equilibration through repeated mixing. Dynamical models show that such impacts are statistically plausible in the Grand Tack or Nice model frameworks, where planetesimals and embryos scatter inward.

Recent work examines moonlet mergers post-disk formation, revealing that collisions between proto-moons can produce realistic outcomes without excessive heating, supporting hybrid single-multiple models. These scenarios also address volatile loss by allowing gradual accretion in a less energetic environment.

Recent Advances from Computational Surveys

High-performance computing has enabled large parameter-space surveys of impact outcomes. A 2023 study conducted over 1,000 SPH simulations, varying impactor mass, velocity, and spin, to map viable Moon-forming conditions. It found that ~10% of impacts produce disks with sufficient mass and low viscosity for rapid moonlet formation. Building on this, a 2024 follow-up incorporated rotating impactors, revealing that prograde spins enhance disk survival and isotopic mixing by altering the collision geometry.

Isotopic constraints have driven innovations like the "impact-induced mixing in a magma ocean" model, where Theia's core merges with Earth's, and its mantle equilibrates in a global magma ocean, yielding Earth-like lunar compositions without full synestia conditions. Similarly, solidification fronts in the post-impact disk explain subtle isotopic "crises" observed in lunar samples.

Implications for Solar System Formation

Refinements to the giant impact model extend beyond the Moon, informing the delivery of water to Earth and the dynamical stability of terrestrial planets. Future missions like Artemis will provide high-fidelity samples to test these predictions, particularly regarding volatile histories.

Conclusion

The giant impact hypothesis, while not without tensions, remains the cornerstone of lunar origin theories, bolstered by increasingly sophisticated simulations. Ongoing work on multiple impacts and high-entropy states promises to resolve lingering discrepancies, painting a dynamic picture of early Earth as a crucible of collisions. As computational power grows, we edge closer to a unified narrative of how our Moon—and perhaps exomoons—emerge from chaos.

For more on planetary science and space exploration:

• Planetary Science & Space - Overview of planetary science topics
• Science - Main science directory

References

1. Kegerreis, A. L., et al. (2023). A systematic survey of Moon-forming giant impacts. arXiv:2307.06078. Link
2. Kegerreis, A. L., et al. (2024). A Systematic Survey of Moon-Forming Giant Impacts. II. Rotating Impactors. arXiv:2409.02746. Link
3. de Vries, J., et al. (2025). Origin of the Moon's Earth-like isotopic composition from giant impacts. arXiv:2504.12122. Link
4. Sahijpal, S., & Bhatia, R. (2018). The role of multiple giant impacts in the formation of the Earth-Moon system. arXiv:1806.00506. Link
5. Nakajima, M., & Stevenson, D. J. (2018). Inefficient volatile loss from the Moon-forming disk. arXiv:1812.10502. Link
6. Lock, S. J., et al. (2025). Origin of the lunar isotopic crisis from solidification of a vaporized synestia. arXiv:2509.06519. Link
7. Rufu, R., et al. (2019). Multiple Impact Origin for the Moon. arXiv:1903.02525. Link
8. Citron, R. I., et al. (2024). Realistic outcomes of moon-moon collisions in Lunar formation theory. arXiv:2411.08659. Link